Projected Staff Compared to
Comparing Data to 2010
Projected Staff FTEs Based on 2010 Enrollment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year | FTEs | Enrollment | District Ratio* | Peer Ratio* | Projected FTEs* | Peer FTEs* | |
| 2010 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| If kept the same Pupil to Staff ratio in that it had in 2010 (0.0 to 1), it would suggest 0 staff members: 0 more than the 0 it actually employed and/or contracted. If it had the same pupil to staff ratio as the Peer (0.0 to 1), it would suggest 0 staff members: 0 more than the 0 it actually employed and/or contracted. During the -2010 years, the number of Teachers has increased by 0.0% and the number of School Administrators has increased by 0.0%. | |||||||
Actual Staff FTEs by Category | |||||||
| Description | 2010 FTEs | FTEs | Change | Projected FTEs* | |||
| Totals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Why it Matters: A trend analysis comparison of pupils to employed and/or contracted staff allows a district to identify its staffing profile over a number of years. Using staffing profile trend data a school district is better able to visualize its operational and budgetary status. This table and analysis is the work of Ric Peterson from Peterson Public Sector Consulting, LLC and is protected intellectual property. (n079)
Data Source: The school district financial data comes from two sources. Historic data is provided by downloads from the State Department of Education. Future data is loaded by the respective school district financial department. (n040)
Report Explanation
| Fiscal Year | Refers to fiscal year ending 6/30 for the year indicated | FTEs | Refers to employee and contracted staff full time equivalents the district self-reported within the required Michigan CEPI REP data collection vehicle | ||||
| District Ratio | Number of pupils per employed and/or contracted staff full time equivalent | Peer Ratio | Number of pupils per employed and/or contracted staff full time equivalent for the Districts in the (i.e., Peer�s total pupils divided by staff). | ||||
| Projected FTEs | Using the Base Fiscal Year ended 6/30/2010 pupil to staff 'District Ratio' as the comparison base, the total projected employed and/or contracted staff full time equivalents have been computed for the fiscal year indicated. | Peer FTEs | Using the Base Fiscal Year ended 6/30/2010 pupil to staff 'Peer Ratio' as the comparison base, the total regional employed and/or contracted staff full time equivalents have been computed for the fiscal year indicated. | ||||
| Pupil Count | Blended Full-time Equivalent Pupil Count | ||||||